How revolutionary is Dr. Hamer's New Medicine?

"Disease" is the body's healthy response to something that is wrong.
Juliane Sacher on a AZK Congress.

What is the significance of Hamer's "5 biological laws of nature"?

It is now over twenty years since I delved into the book "Vermächtnis einer Neuen Medizin" from Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer . The occasion was a "cancer death" in the family. His book stood at the beginning of my long and exciting journey into the exploration of healing science: What are the true causes of "illness" and the prerequisites for true healing? Is everything curable?

Even before Dr. Hamer, Prof. Julius Hackethal made headlines with his alternative and successful "cancer treatments," which awakened my urge to research. 
Like Hackethal, Dr. Hamer had a rather difficult stand in the orthodox medical world from the very beginning. This was not only because he proclaimed a "Third Medical Revolution", but also because of the somewhat unfortunate combination of scientific research with personal conspiracy themes. 

Overview

• Dr. Hamer's basic theses
• In-depth information
• "Biological conflicts" and psychological causes
• Is "sniffles" a "scent conflict"?
• Is medical diagnosis becoming the voodoo curse of modernity?
• Expand the tunnel vision
• These theses are well compatible with Dr. Hamer's concept
• Other important influences on health
• Summary

Dr. Hamer's basic theses

The basis of his "New Medicine" is the assumption that "biological conflicts" underlie all diseases. For example, "territorial conflict", "fear of death conflict", "loss conflict" or "hunger conflict". Hamer apparently assumes that we humans are subject to the same "biological" laws as animals. However, the conflict-causing situations in humans are usually different from those in animals.

A "biological conflict" arises already by ONE drastic event like the loss of a child or partner. Hamer distinguishes 2 phases: the active phase of the unresolved conflict and the so-called "healing phase" after conflict resolution. 

Phase 1 is often not perceived at all, and the "healing phase" 2 is usually perceived as an "illness". As examples of occurring "concomitant symptoms" Hamer mentions "tuberculosis", "leukemia" or "heart attack". These are phenomena which are seen as serious "diseases" in allopathy.
Here, I find it not so crucial which terms enter into the diagnosis, but whether the phenomena noted are fought or understood. - Read in addition also the parable-like old essay of Arnold Ehret: “So the disease speaks.“
In any case, Hamer does not want to fight them, but simply to allow them, or, if necessary, to mitigate them somewhat.

In-depth information

Hamer's extensive Book or rather his published research can only be described and evaluated here in a rudimentary and superficial way. However, several introductions can be found on the Internet. This longer video gives a very detailed and entertaining introduction to Hamer's work:

More links: Germanic medicine, Germanic medicine Dr Hamer
And on this website (also only German) you will find another detailed and much more critical treatise of the "Germanic New Medicine", as it is called in recent times.
I myself cannot allow myself any judgment on this and refer to the two different publications on Hamer's work as a substitute. As always, I recommend you to find your own truth.
Below I share my thoughts on the "New Medicine." 

"Biological conflicts" and psychological causes

In his definition of pathogenic events Hamer uses, among others, the terms "biological" and "territorial conflict". Apparently he wants to clarify with it that certain internal programs of the human body work analogously to "conflicts" among free-living animals. Correspondingly, in the above video there is talk about the "validity of the laws of nature".
For me, however, the conflicts described are more of a psychological than a "biological" nature.

As subscribers to this blog know, I am convinced that the primary causes of "disease" are never found in the physical, but always in the spiritual. The body reflects this with corresponding symptoms. Universal spiritual laws dominate the "natural" laws within the matrix. "You are the placebo", that is, you can bring about self-healing with divine spirit power.
Nevertheless, I see Dr. Hamer's basic statements to a certain extent in harmony with my convictions, even if the term "biological" seems to refer to physical forms and processes. Because basically Hamer is also concerned with recognizing and solving mental, typically human conflicts instead of fighting symptoms.

Is "sniffles" a "scent conflict"?

In the above video it is said that "sniffles" is a "scent conflict". I don't know if Dr. Hamer has also defined it this way. However: Such an interpretation is for me already a somewhat convulsive attempt to press EVERY phenomenon into the template "biological conflict" or "man similar animal".

For me, a cold is more an expression of a Cleaning program, which takes place both in the spiritual and mirrored in the physical. It is activated from time to time when man has become involved in unsuitable spiritual and physical nourishment.
At the same time, a cold can be a mental sign that you are "fed up" and it is high time to change a certain situation in your life. This and similar interpretations can be found e.g. in publishings by Rüdiger Dahlke.

Also the association of "liver cancer" with a "hunger conflict" - made in the video - is anything but conclusive for me. Especially since in my understanding the liver stands for positive as well as negative "life rage". For example, a friend of mine had "incurable" "liver cancer" as a result of suppressed, swallowed anger at his exceedingly nasty wife. This spawn of a malignant xanthippe (sorry, my own perception) never tired of humiliating him at every opportunity.
After he finally broke up with her, the "cancer" disappeared as if by itself. 

Is medical diagnosis becoming the voodoo curse of modernity?

Dr. Joe Dispenza asks this - in my opinion - very legitimate question and writes: "As soon as the patient consults the doctor and hears a professional opinion, he automatically accepts the disease."
So-called "cancer screening" is the main reason for the flourishing of expensive chemo-"therapies" and surgeries. Based on their laboratory findings, white coats in "cancer" fighting mode feel entitled to pronounce death sentences without recognizing fundamental correlations.
Dr. Hamer concludes that the resulting effect on the patients' fear of death mostly even causes a further "secondary cancer". This "secondary cancer" is in no case a "metastasis", but the result of a "death anxiety conflict".

Dr. Gerd Reuther confirms the fatal consequences of medical diagnoses. He comes in his book "Heilung Nebensache (Healing secondary matter)"unmistakably to this clear conclusion:
Every medical intervention in human history since ancient times has caused more harm and death than it has supported healing.

Is Hamer's thesis of the "healing phase" correct?

For the success of healing, any diagnosis is significant in that it is a strengthening or weakening judgment of an "authority."
Whether Dr. Hamer's thesis is correct that "tuberculosis", "leukemia" or "heart attack" are "only" concomitants of a "healing phase" assumed by him, I cannot judge. Not a few consider this thesis to be grossly negligent. 
How many people who had such "accompanying symptoms" have experienced healing through the support of Dr. Hamer and how many have not? Unfortunately, I do not have enough information on this. 

In some cases, it is probably more healing to simply trust that healing will happen, regardless of the truth of the diagnoses. For it is fear that gives birth to "disease." However, fear-inducing diagnoses are rarely helpful in the healing process. Exception: You are suddenly seized - after the "death sentence" - by a rebellious rage for life, which catapults you into a life-affirming "Now more than ever!"

Expand the tunnel vision

Most medical therapy concepts have certain blinkers or tunnel vision. One's own convictions are gladly made absolute and provided with a unique characteristic.
This impression is also given to me by the "New Medicine" according to Dr. Hamer.
Since minute microbes and cell particles became significant objects of diagnostic investigation, too many therapists have largely lost a holistic view of the human condition. "Viruses" are not only invisible, but could never be proven.
The soul or High Self is also invisible, yet it is truer than any visible form within the Matrix illusion.

Outstanding spiritual healers like Dascalos or Bruno Gröning need neither computer tomography (CT) like Dr. Hamer nor MRI or high-tech laboratories. Because they know that every healing comes from God or the Divine Source. The Source is infallible.
In the above video, an alternative practitioner is featured who herself has no need to use the CT technique to help her clients resolve conflict or trauma.

Dr. Hamer has been able to help hundreds, if not thousands of sick people in their healing, also with CT. Just by offering a new way of looking at the processes in the body as well as the triggering conflicts.
For me it is always useful to recognize the common truths of different therapy concepts and to avoid tunnel vision.

These theses are well compatible with Dr. Hamer's concept:

• "Disease" is the body's healthy response to something that is wrong.
• Any "Cancer"has psychological causes, first and foremost fear.
• Anxiety and stress are central factors for "diseases".
• Self-healing processes are constantly taking place within us on several levels.
• Body Symptoms lead us to psychological, traumatic causes.
• There is no "Viruses“.
• Placebos prove our inherent self-healing powers.
• Consciously changing certain life conditions and beliefs is healing.
• Life-affirming confidence brings about healing.
• Only the soul determines the end of the physical embodiment, apart from a few exceptions.
• There are no "incurable diseases", however, incurable people.
• We create our physical environment with thoughts., beliefs and judgments.

Other important influences on health

Beyond what Dr. Hamer calls "biological conflicts," there are several other important influences on our health.
Body symptoms are not the only signs that something is wrong. For example, electronic energy robbers can also make us sick. 
Attachments or occupations by parasitic, demonic beings can really paralyze our life on all levels. At the same time, the conscious perception of their destructive work can help to reintegrate split-off parts of the soul.

An unbalanced diet also belongs to the symptom level and can be interpreted as a call from the soul to open up to the underlying causes.

Last but not least, there are karmic influences that draw attention to themselves in the present embodiment through "illnesses". According to Dascalos even all diseases ultimately have karmic causes.
In the linked article Dascalos describes the powerful backlash of "elementals". This backlash can be positive or negative, depending on what we have sent out before.

Summary

Dr. Hamer's work deserves positive recognition. Alone the perception of a body intelligence, which provides suitable special programs in conflict situations, stands out pleasantly from harmful combative medicine.

Is the "new medicine" revolutionary?
Yes, at least for allopathic conventional doctors. However, many other therapists have arrived at equally new, revolutionary therapy concepts in parallel.
Some of them I have already presented in this blog. Even greater revolutionary innovations are imminent or very near - both technologically and spiritually.

For me it is essential that Hamer puts the solution of traumatic or mental conflicts in the center of his work. He assumes that only ONE critical moment is needed, which carries enough charge for the revival of a pathogenic conflict.
This is probably true for the emergence moment of a dominant conflict, because we often carry around several unresolved, interrelated conflicts or issues.

Certainly, it makes sense to search for this dominant moment while in severe illness in order to be able to resolve the most consequential conflict. But access to the most severe traumas is not always open. Sometimes we can only approach step by step, peeling off one "onion skin" at a time.

Go the heart's way of resonnance.

Life or our High Self guides us on the path of healing. The resonance felt in the heart decides which therapy you can entrust yourself to. 
Maybe you will meet a healer on your way who works according to Dr. Hamer's "New Medicine". In essence, it is your trust that determines the success of any healing.

Also, because there are relatively few therapists who work according to Dr. Hamer, I think it is obvious not to become too attached to his approach. An alert examination of his work can provide new perspectives. However, an autodidactic solo attempt is not advisable in many cases.
Why? Because unresolved traumas are usually frozen in the subconscious and not accessible to the mind. Most of the time, it takes experienced facilitators who can help you access the traumatic experiences consciously with appropriate techniques and empathy.

You are eternal.

The soul decides when to discard the physical body. Death is an illusion linked to the apparent separateness from the ego's point of view. Illness is - according to "A Course in Miracles" - a defense against the awakening. 

Many teachers today will try to tell you that life is just a dream, nothing more than an illusion.
But a far greater illusion is death.

Nil'Amma Tara, "the oldest woman on earth" at over 1000 years old

You are not the body, but a spiritual, eternally living being who wants to experience himself in a limited, dual world.

For you are a beautiful flower
in this garden life!
Without you and your unique scent
the world would be different.
You bring something special,
something that no one else can bring.
Discover your own beauty,
Your own powers, all of which are already there.

Jeru Kabbal

*Note:

I became acquainted with Dr. Hamer's work under the book title "Legacy of a New Medicine". In the meantime it has become "Germanic New Medicine". Unfortunately, I have not yet found out any valid reasons for the name change. 

◊

If you can contribute any important information on the topic of "New Medicine", I would be very happy if you share it here in the comments!

These articles fit the topic well: